🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to restrict social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a increasing number of states are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "taking away our children's youth". Legislation may be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an similar ban is "a potential measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to approve a law lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a related move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding statement supporting a ban for minors without parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a good foundation," stated the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on robust evidence".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the family of a girl who took her own life after viewing disturbing social media material suggests that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for young users," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, regulation is largely unfolding at the regional government level due to federal inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule limiting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed measures demanding guardian approval for minors to open social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from various individuals to copy Australia's example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Views

Apart from these regions, further countries are also exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, world agencies strike a more measured stance. Unicef has advised that social media bans have downsides and "could backfire". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in safety.

While this global debate continues, the steps of Australia and others indicate that states around the world are increasingly prepared to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.